July 29, 2010

JetBlue Case Study

Filed under: case study — admin @ 5:31 am



FINANCIAL RATIOS

QUICK RATIOS

Current ratio

This measures the firm’s ability to meet its short term financial obligations. It is calculated as

Current Ratio

  =  

Current Assets

 

Current Liabilities

 

283,059

=1.049673

269,664

 

 

 

 

 

 

From the case,

 

 

Quick Ratio

  =  

Current Assets – Inventory

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

4,840

= 0.017948

269,664

From the case,

 

 

Cash Ratio

  =  

Cash  +  Marketable Securities

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

From the case, 

246,752

=0.915035

269,664

 

This clearly means the firm cannot meet its short term financial obligations

 

ASSET TURNOVER RATIOS

These ratios indicate of how efficiently the firm utilizes its assets. Receivables turnover is an indication of how quickly the firm collects its accounts receivables. It is usually reported in terms of the number of days that credit sales remain in accounts receivable before they are collected. The result is known as the collection period. It is calculated as

Receivables Turnover =

Annual Credit Sales

Accounts Receivable

 

The information on Annual Credit Sales is not provided hence this ratio cannot be determined

Inventory turnover

It is the cost of goods sold in a time period divided by the average inventory level during that period

Inventory Turnover =

Cost of Goods Sold

Average Inventory

 

The information on Cost of goods sold is not provided hence this ratio cannot be determined

 

FINANCIAL LEVERAGE RATIOS

These ratios are concerned with the long-term solvency of the firm. The ratios measure the extent to which the firm is using long term debt.

Debt Ratio =

Total Debt

Total Assets

Debt Ratio =

324,752

=0.235511

 

1,378,923

 

         

Debt-to-Equity Ratio =

Total Debt

Total Equity

 

Debt-to-Equity Ratio =

324,752

=0.783152

414,673

 

 

 

From the ratios, JetBlue is using long term debt as a source of financing

 

 

PROFITABILITY RATIOS

Return on Assets (ROA)

This ratio measures how effectively the firm’s assets are being used to generate profits

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

Return on Assets (ROA) =

———————————-

 

 

Average Total Assets

 

 

 

 

From the case study,

Return on Assets (ROA) =

54,908

=0.556295

98,703

 

 

 

This means that for every dollar of assets, JetBlue uses 0.55 to generate profits

Return on Equity (ROE)

This ratio measures the profits earned for each dollar invested in the firm’s stock

 

 

 

Net Income

 

Return on Equity (ROE) =

——————————————–

 

 

Average Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

Return on Equity (ROE) =

54,908

0.132413

414,673

 

 

 This implies that JetBlue earns 0.132 as profits from each dollar of stock

 

Return on Common Equity (ROCE)

This ratio measures the profits earned for each dollar invested in the firm’s stock from common equity

 

 

 

Net Income

 

Return on Common Equity (ROCE) =

——————————————–

 

 

Average Common Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

From the case study,

Return on Common Equity (ROCE) =

54,908

=0.00011

500,000,000

   

 

Profit Margin

This ratio is a measure of the gross profit earned on sales. It is calculated as

 

 

 

Net Income

 

Profit Margin =

—————–

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

There is no information on the sales

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

This ratio measures the average earning per share invested in JetBlue

 

 

 

Net Income

 

Earnings Per Share (EPS) =

———————————————

 

 

Number of Common Shares Outstanding

 

   

 

 

From the case study

Earnings Per Share (EPS) =

54,908

=0.008388

6,545,950

 

The earnings per share is relatively low and investors will get low returns on investment

 

THE MISING MATRICES

Competitive profile matrix

CPM allows the firm to compare the competitor critical success factor with your organization. The CPM for JetBlue can be summarized as below

 

JETBLUE

DELTA AIRLINES

SOUTH WEST

Critical success factor

Weight

Rating

Weighted score

Weight

Rating

Weighted score

Weight

Rating

Weighted score

Well known for quality & reliable service

0.15

4

0.6

0.15

3

0.45

0.15

3

0.45

Efficiency in operations

0.20

4

0.8

0.20

2

0.4

0.20

4

0.8

Balances cost with quality service

0.15

4

0.6

0.15

2

0.3

0.15

3

0.45

Good reputation and image

0.15

3

0.45

0.15

2

0.3

0.15

3

0.45

Strong Leadership team

0.10

3

0.3

0.10

3

0.3

0.10

2

0.2

Highly motivated and loyal staff

0.15

3

0.45

0.15

2

0.3

0.15

3

0.45

Financial ratios

0.10

2

0.2

0.10

1

0.1

0.10

1

0.1

TOTAL

1.00

 

3.40

1.00

 

2.15

1.00

 

2.90

 

A 1-4 rating to each critical success factor indicates how effectively the firm’s current strategies respond to the factor.
(1 = response is poor, 4 = response is extremely good)

The weight range from 0.0 to 1.0 lower number shows no or minimum importance and high weight show more importance of factor to the company.

It is clear that JetBlue has a strong position.

 

The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

QSPM attempts to objectively select the best strategy using input from other management techniques.

The QSPM matrix for JetBlue is as follows

 

Product differentiation & Value added services

Expansion to other markets

Internal strengths

Weight

Attractiveness

Total attractiveness score

Weight

Attractiveness

Total attractiveness score

Well known for quality & reliable service

16%

4

0.64

13%

3

0.39

Efficiency in operations

12%

4

0.48

11%

4

0.44

Balances cost with quality service

10%

4

0.4

9%

3

0.27

Good reputation and image

10%

3

0.3

11%

3

0.33

Strong Leadership team

8%

3

0.24

8%

2

0.16

Highly motivated and loyal staff

8%

4

0.32

9%

3

0.27

Financial ratios

9%

3

0.27

11%

3

0.33

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

Internal Weaknesses

 

 

0

 

 

 

Highly crowded market

15%

1

0.15

13%

1

0.13

Limited access to international markets

8%

2

0.16

9%

2

0.18

Single Fleet

4%

1

0.04

6%

1

0.06

TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE

100%

 

3

100%

 

2.56

             

Opportunities

Weight

Rating

Average Score

Weight

Rating

Average Score

Increased demand and popularity

16%

4

0.64

15%

3

0.45

Automation of operations

14%

4

0.56

16%

4

0.64

Growth of low cost  airline sector

18%

4

0.72

14%

2

0.28

Expansion to other world markets

16%

3

0.48

16%

3

0.48

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

Threats

 

 

0

 

 

 

Effects of terrorism and war

4%

4

0.16

4%

3

0.12

Emerging competition

11%

3

0.33

12%

2

0.24

Declining Margins

9%

3

0.27

12%

3

0.36

Economic down turn

12%

1

0.12

11%

1

0.11

TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE

100%

 

3.28

100%

 

2.68

             

(Attractiveness Score: 1 = not acceptable; 2 = possibly acceptable; 3 = probably acceptable; 4 = most acceptable; 0 = not relevant)

 

From the above statistics, JetBlue will find it easy to adopt the product differentiation and value added strategy, it has a better rating of 3.28

                                            

SPACE MATRIX

The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation matrix (SPACE matrix) focuses on strategy formulation especially as related to the competitive position of an organization. The matrix is divided into four quadrants namely Aggressive, Conservative, Defensive and Competitive (Porter 1998). From the case study, JetBlue is in the aggressive quadrant where it is seeking to utilize its internal strengths to penetrate into the potential markets.

 

SPACE MATRIX

Internal Strategic position

External strategic position

competitive

Industry

1  Quality of service

2  Market crowding

1  Reputation& Image

3  Barriers to entry

2  Flight turnaround

1  Emerging competition

2  Value added services

3  Diminishing profitability

5 worst 1 best

5 best   1 worst

 

 

Financial

Environmental

5  Cash flow

3  Economic crisis

3  Profitability

2  Technological advancement

4  Earnings Per share

4  Taxation

4  Return on equity

4  Changing customer preferences

5 best   1 worst

5 worst 1 best

 

SWOT MATRIX

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESSES

Well known for quality and reliable service

Highly crowded market

Efficiency in operations

Limited access to international markets

Balances costs with quality services

Single fleet operation

Good reputation and image

 

Highly motivated and loyal staff members

 

OPPORTUNITIES

THREATS

Increased demand and popularity

Effects of terrorism and war

Automation of operations

Emerging competition

Growth of low cost airline sector

Declining Margins

Expansion to other world markets

Economic down turn

 

It is clear that JetBlue is a strong competitor to other companies

 

 

THE BCG MATRIX

The Boston Consulting group matrix portrays a firm in terms of relative market share position and industry growth rate as follows (Porter 1998)

Question Marks-Low market share but compete in high growth markets

Stars-high relative market share and compete in high growth rate industries

Cash Cows-high relative market position, but compete in a low-growth industry

Dogs-market share position and compete in a slowed or no-growth industry

From the case study, JetBlue airlines is basically in the stars quadrant.

 

ENDS… AGGREY NZOMO n.kavalu@gmail.com

 

Finding a Suitable Master's Degree Program in Australia

Filed under: master of study — admin @ 12:10 am



Your master’s degree from Australian University has the international reputation. In the Australian education system, many graduate programs are offered in all possible areas of study. Typically, most of the Australian universities introduce many new programs as per the requirements of the occupations in the job market. Here, students will be offered their courses in the forms of attending lectures, tutorials, seminars in addition to that students are offered to erform independent research in libraries and laboratories.

Students pursuing masters’ degree from Australia are encouraged to collect and analyze the data either individually or in groups. They have to participate in various debates and will be discussing about their queries and related topics in a logical manner.

Typically, an Australian masters’ degree will be about 1 to 2 years and there will be unique way of assessment for the students. Students will be evaluated through conducting periodic tests, dissertation, oral presentation, class participation, practical work, examinations, essays and reports.



MBA in Australia:


Australian education is renowned for its MBA programs offered by many top Business schools in the country. It has become a popular destination for pursuing MBA. The following are some of the most popular business schools in Australia:

Melbourne Business University

Macquarie University

Monash Mount Eliza Business School

University of Queensland

University of Adelaide

RMIT

Curtin University of Technology

University of Australia

Admissions Criteria: Australian universities admission has its own entry requirements for the admission criteria of master’s program, where students have to get through the IELTS or TOEFL test scores. Many universities require students to have a certain grade point average, GPA, from high school or undergraduate degree.

To find a suitable program students have to identify their goals and constraints. This would help students in choosing the most efficient program that matches them much better, which can meet their academic, financial and personal needs.

Choose the most suitable location and university before selection of the study program. Impel highly recommends its students that environment is the essential element in the selection process. Students have to make their choice of the location, where they feel more comfortable. Impel provides proper guidance for the students and assist them in making choice of location, university and course program.

Thus, students have to consider various issues while choosing a program to study abroad either it may be Australia or USA or UK. However, Impel take cares of all the hassles in your processing and assures you in making right selection of excellent study abroad program.

July 28, 2010

Discover How to Teach Business English

Filed under: english study — admin @ 7:03 pm



People decide to learn English for many different reasons. It could be a hobby, a desire to study in an English speaking country, to understand songs and books in English or to open up business opportunities and be selected for promotion in your company. Business English is in great demand and if you can teach it effectively, then you will never be without teaching work.

If you are living in another country and you want to teach Business English, you can make build your student base yourself or work for an institute that teaches business English. Business English tends to be lucrative as business people and companies are willing to pay for high quality and efficient language acquisition.

Business English differs from regular language instruction in that you are preparing the business people for specifically business related situations. Depending on the level of the students, you are likely to have to include regular grammar and target language practise, but this can also be delivered with a business angle.

Another part of teaching business English is that you will most likely have to prepare your students for doing business with native English speakers and their customs. For example, business in Japan is done in a very different way to in the west. Where Japanese business people would bow, westerners are more direct and less deferential and go for hand shaking.

Providing classes that use role play to practise cultural exchanges and customs that your students are likely to encounter in a business setting is icing on the business English cake. This aspect is often overlooked by other business English teachers and you can use them to set yourself apart from your competition.

Depending on the type of business people you are instructing, there will be specific vocabulary that it will be vital to teach. There will also be certain situations that they will find they encounter more often than others. When you are teaching business English, it is important that you tailor their learning to their needs. In this way business English is much more diagnostic in its pedagogy and approach than traditional English learning.

Lessons in business English can and should include: role plays of different business situations, telephone conversations, writing emails and letters in formal tone, how to do negotiations, key points of customer service and using language politely and formally. Since rubbing elbows is often part of conducting business it is also important to include classes on how to do small talk and chat politely to business acquaintances.

When starting out with your business English students it is a great idea to meet with them and find out what they want to get from their business English classes. This is a professional and easy way to ensure that you meet their language needs and expectations.

Business English classes can be a profitable and interesting avenue of ESL. Business English students often come with high expectations of what they want from their classes, but you will often find that they are dedicated and highly motivated students.